I want to share this article which highlights public service and policies which have a profound impact on American families. Cutbacks of USDA service which the current administration campaigned in 2016 and now #election2020 would rebuild America. The reports shows signs our nation’s families as well as children outcomes with SNAP.
Trump’s tweeted comments have a profound impact in Washington, DC; leader and discussion attacks social programs. Once before supporting then 180 degree change. Services and benefit of which President Trump’s base use,yet somehow believe Trump’s speeches (no value for their own business,families, and children). How it’s possible not to consider how the economy may be effected when programs are defunded, and public policies change the very value most important to Republican’s base? In the report which is included in my blog makes for a comprehensive review of the current policy set by President Trump’s administration. Please keep in mind, the Trump’s campaign has focused on systemic disruption of public service agencies and departments which families depend. Whereas depicting social programs (example SNAP) via USDA budget as governmental waste by President Trump Including cabinet members regaining thus far. In recent weeks increasing restrictions for clients as well as state administrative regulations.
Our Priority for Republican candidates
Please read this article below. It has key components which Both political leaders should keep mindful #election2020.
SNAP moved 3.1 million people out of poverty in 2018
DANIELLE WILSON AND LIANA FOX | SEPTEMBER 10, 2019
The Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) reduced poverty by just over 1 percentage point for the three-year period from 2016 to 2018, according to data released by the U.S. Census Bureau today.
The Supplemental Poverty Measure (SPM) shows that SNAP – formerly known as food stamps – cut the poverty rate from 14.3% to 13.2%. This means that with SNAP benefits, an average 3.5 million fewer people were living below the poverty line during that three-year period.
However, there are notable state-level variations; New Mexico, Louisiana and Mississippi were among the states where SNAP had the greatest anti-poverty impact (see Table 1 and Figure 1).
Why SPM is Important
The SPM allows us to gauge the potential magnitude of the effect of tax credits and transfers in alleviating poverty.
The SPM, an alternative to the official poverty measure, considers the value of noncash government transfers, taxes, and necessary expenses into the resources a family has available to meet their basic needs.
By subtracting the value of SNAP from resources and recalculating poverty rates (assuming no behavioral changes and all else constant), we can show how many people would have been in poverty in the absence of SNAP.
How does SNAP Reduce Poverty across the Country?
SNAP is a nutritional assistance program that aims to help low-income families afford a nutritionally balanced diet. Among the additions to resources considered by the SPM, SNAP has consistently been among the most impactful noncash transfer.
SNAP is estimated to have prevented approximately 3.1 million people from falling into poverty in 2018 and an average of 3.5 million across 2016-2018.
To create state-level estimates using the Current Population Survey Annual Social and Economic Supplement (CPS ASEC), the Census Bureau recommends using 3-year averages for additional statistical reliability.
The 3-year average poverty rate for the United States in 2016-2018 was 13.2% using the SPM. Subtracting out the value of SNAP allows us to estimate that SNAP benefits decreased the SPM rate by slightly above 1 percentage point, from 14.3% to 13.2%.
This means that with SNAP benefits, 3.5 million fewer people were living below the poverty line.
SNAP is estimated to have decreased the SPM rate in 42 of the 50 states and in the District of Columbia by a value that is greater than or not significantly different than 1 percentage point.
Figure 1 above illustrates the impact of SNAP benefits on SPM poverty by state.
New Mexico, Louisiana and Mississippi were among the states where SNAP had the greatest anti-poverty impact, decreasing each state’s SPM rate by 2.3, 1.9 and 1.8 percentage points, respectively.
Impact on Child Poverty
Children under age 18 are the largest age group receiving SNAP. The program is estimated to have decreased the SPM rate for children by 2.0 percentage points on average, from 16.5% to 14.5%.
Again, New Mexico, Louisiana and Mississippi were among the states most affected by SNAP. The program decreased the child poverty rate of each state by 4.5, 3.8 and 3.4 percentage points, respectively.
For the United States, SNAP reduced SPM poverty for adults 18 to 64 years by 0.8 percentage points (from 13.5% to 12.7%) and by 0.6 percentage points (from 14.2 to 13.6) for adults aged 65 and over.
See Table 1 below for a list of the 10 states whose populations were most affected by SNAP. See Tables 1a-1d (pdf) for full details.
Danielle Wilson is an intern and Liana Fox is a survey statistician in the Social, Economic and Housing Statistics Division at the Census Bureau.
Also Released Today
STORY | SEPTEMBER 10, 2019Payday, Poverty, and WomenBetween 2017 and 2018, women working full-time, year-round experienced a significant gain in median earnings but more women than men live in poverty.
2020 Census in the ClassroomGaps in the Wealth of Americans by Household TypeAre Women Really Opting Out of Work After They Have Babies?Your Health Care Is in Women’s HandsFrom Horseback to Satellite, How U.S. Census Bureau Checks AddressesWhere Do College Graduates Go For Jobs
America Counts tells the stories behind the numbers in a new inviting way. We feature stories on various topics such as families, housing, employment, business, education, the economy, emergency preparedness, and population. Contact our Public Information Office for media inquiries or interviews.
Measuring America’s People, Places, and EconomyX Is this page helpful?